Loading...
Loading...
Head to head
Alpha Capital Group and FundingPipscompared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Flexible evaluation rules — free news trading, very low minimum days, mostly static drawdowns — but the trailing Alpha One and a 40% best-day payout rule are the real catches.
Best for: Active scalpers and news traders who want flexible evaluation rules — take the 1-day Alpha One sprint or the static-drawdown Pro/Swing plans — and who respect the 40% best-day payout rule.
Start a Alpha Capital Group challengeStatic (non-trailing) evaluation drawdowns, up to 100% split and $2M scaling make it one of the more winnable challenges — as long as you avoid the strategies it deems 'toxic.'
Best for: Discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.
Start a FundingPips challenge| Rule | Alpha Capital Group | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| FundedWiki rating | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 |
| Type | Forex | Forex |
| Profit split | 80% (scales to $2M virtual capital) | 60% – 100% |
| Max drawdown | Mixed | Mixed |
| Consistency rule | Yes | Yes |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Limited | Limited |
| Min trading days | 1 day | 1 day |
| Funding models | 1-Step, 2-Step, 3-Step | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant |
| Platforms | MT5 | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader |
| Rules decoded | 11 | 12 |
Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Alpha Capital Group runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 50 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Alpha Capital Group restricts news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. Alpha Capital Group is best for active scalpers and news traders who want flexible evaluation rules — take the 1-day Alpha One sprint or the static-drawdown Pro/Swing plans — and who respect the 40% best-day payout rule.; FundingPips is best for discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles..
Alpha Capital Group advertises a 80% (scales to $2M virtual capital) profit split; FundingPips advertises 60% – 100%. Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.
Alpha Capital Group runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 50 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Alpha Capital Group restricts news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Picked one? Check for a live discount first.
PropFirmDrops tracks current Alpha Capital Group and FundingPipschallenge promos & discount codes.
Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with Alpha Capital Group or FundingPips. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.