Loading...
Loading...
Head to head
Apex Trader Funding and FundingPipscompared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.3/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
100% split and no daily limit make it the most generous futures eval on paper — but the unrealized-equity trailing drawdown that only locks at start + $100, plus consistency and scaling rules, is what blows accounts.
Best for: Disciplined manual intraday futures scalpers who size small, respect a hard stop, flatten before 4:59 PM ET, and can navigate the trailing-drawdown + consistency rules — not algo/HFT or swing traders.
Start a Apex Trader Funding challengeStatic (non-trailing) evaluation drawdowns, up to 100% split and $2M scaling make it one of the more winnable challenges — as long as you avoid the strategies it deems 'toxic.'
Best for: Discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.
Start a FundingPips challenge| Rule | Apex Trader Funding | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| FundedWiki rating | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 |
| Type | Futures | Forex |
| Profit split | 100% (after safety net) | 60% – 100% |
| Max drawdown | Mixed | Mixed |
| Consistency rule | Yes | Yes |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | — | Limited |
| Min trading days | — | 1 day |
| Funding models | 1-Step | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant |
| Platforms | Rithmic, Tradovate, WealthCharts | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader |
| Rules decoded | 11 | 12 |
Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.3/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Apex Trader Funding runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 55 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Apex Trader Funding restricts news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.3/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. Apex Trader Funding is best for disciplined manual intraday futures scalpers who size small, respect a hard stop, flatten before 4:59 PM ET, and can navigate the trailing-drawdown + consistency rules — not algo/HFT or swing traders.; FundingPips is best for discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles..
Apex Trader Funding advertises a 100% (after safety net) profit split; FundingPips advertises 60% – 100%. Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.
Apex Trader Funding runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 55 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Apex Trader Funding restricts news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Picked one? Check for a live discount first.
PropFirmDrops tracks current Apex Trader Funding and FundingPipschallenge promos & discount codes.
Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with Apex Trader Funding or FundingPips. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.