Head to head
Blueberry Funded vs BrightFunded
Blueberry Funded and BrightFunded compared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. Blueberry Funded edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.3/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Broker-backed credibility, simple static drawdown and no consistency rule — but the strict no-close-during-news policy and the 1.5% per-trade-idea cap on funded accounts are the real traps.
Best for: Swing/intraday traders who want simple static drawdown and no consistency rule, and who don't scalp, news-trade or run HFT/arbitrage.
Start a Blueberry Funded challengeNo consistency rule anywhere, static 2-step drawdown, generous holding rules and a Trade2Earn token layer — just mind the funded-stage news soft-breach and the one-account-per-person policy.
Best for: Discretionary swing and news traders who want generous holding rules, no consistency cap and a fast path to a 100% split — and who keep to one account.
Start a BrightFunded challengeSide by side
| Rule | Blueberry Funded | BrightFunded |
|---|---|---|
| FundedWiki rating | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Type | Forex | Forex |
| Profit split | 80% (→90% via scaling) | 80% – 100% |
| Max drawdown | Mixed | Mixed |
| Consistency rule | None | None |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Yes | Yes |
| Min trading days | 3 days | 5 days |
| Funding models | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant | 1-Step, 2-Step |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, DXtrade, TradingView | MT5, DXtrade |
| Rules decoded | 10 | 10 |
Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.
The verdict
Blueberry Funded edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.3/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Blueberry Funded runs the tighter rulebook, so BrightFunded gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 47 vs 43 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Blueberry Funded restricts news trading; BrightFunded restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Blueberry Funded vs BrightFunded — FAQ
Is Blueberry Funded or BrightFunded better?
Blueberry Funded edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.3/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. Blueberry Funded is best for swing/intraday traders who want simple static drawdown and no consistency rule, and who don't scalp, news-trade or run HFT/arbitrage.; BrightFunded is best for discretionary swing and news traders who want generous holding rules, no consistency cap and a fast path to a 100% split — and who keep to one account..
Blueberry Funded vs BrightFunded: which has the better profit split?
Blueberry Funded advertises a 80% (→90% via scaling) profit split; BrightFunded advertises 80% – 100%. Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.
Which has stricter rules, Blueberry Funded or BrightFunded?
Blueberry Funded runs the tighter rulebook, so BrightFunded gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 47 vs 43 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Does Blueberry Funded or BrightFunded allow news trading?
Blueberry Funded restricts news trading; BrightFunded restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Picked one? Check for a live discount first.
PropFirmDrops tracks current Blueberry Funded and BrightFunded challenge promos & discount codes.
Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with Blueberry Funded or BrightFunded. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.