Head to head
Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips
Blueberry Funded and FundingPips compared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Broker-backed credibility, simple static drawdown and no consistency rule — but the strict no-close-during-news policy and the 1.5% per-trade-idea cap on funded accounts are the real traps.
Best for: Swing/intraday traders who want simple static drawdown and no consistency rule, and who don't scalp, news-trade or run HFT/arbitrage.
Start a Blueberry Funded challengeStatic (non-trailing) evaluation drawdowns, up to 100% split and $2M scaling make it one of the more winnable challenges — as long as you avoid the strategies it deems 'toxic.'
Best for: Discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.
Start a FundingPips challengeSide by side
| Rule | Blueberry Funded | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| FundedWiki rating | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 |
| Type | Forex | Forex |
| Profit split | 80% (→90% via scaling) | 60% – 100% |
| Max drawdown | Mixed | Mixed |
| Consistency rule | None | Yes |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Yes | Limited |
| Min trading days | 3 days | 1 day |
| Funding models | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, DXtrade, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader |
| Rules decoded | 10 | 12 |
Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.
The verdict
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Blueberry Funded runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 47 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Blueberry Funded restricts news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips — FAQ
Is Blueberry Funded or FundingPips better?
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. Blueberry Funded is best for swing/intraday traders who want simple static drawdown and no consistency rule, and who don't scalp, news-trade or run HFT/arbitrage.; FundingPips is best for discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles..
Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips: which has the better profit split?
Blueberry Funded advertises a 80% (→90% via scaling) profit split; FundingPips advertises 60% – 100%. Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.
Which has stricter rules, Blueberry Funded or FundingPips?
Blueberry Funded runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 47 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Does Blueberry Funded or FundingPips allow news trading?
Blueberry Funded restricts news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Picked one? Check for a live discount first.
PropFirmDrops tracks current Blueberry Funded and FundingPips challenge promos & discount codes.
Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with Blueberry Funded or FundingPips. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.