Skip to main content

Head to head

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips

City Traders Imperium and FundingPips compared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.3/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.

City Traders Imperium logo
City Traders Imperium8.3/10 · Forex

Genuinely swing-friendly — balance-based drawdown, no daily cap on the 1-Step, and a path to 100% + salary — but mind the 60-second stop-loss rule and the much higher first-payout bar.

Best for: Swing and position traders who hold through news and weekends and want a balance-based drawdown with no daily cap — and who are disciplined about always setting a stop-loss.

Start a City Traders Imperium challenge
FundingPips logo
FundingPips8.8/10 · Forex

Static (non-trailing) evaluation drawdowns, up to 100% split and $2M scaling make it one of the more winnable challenges — as long as you avoid the strategies it deems 'toxic.'

Best for: Discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.

Start a FundingPips challenge

Side by side

RuleCity Traders ImperiumFundingPips
FundedWiki rating8.3/108.8/10
TypeForexForex
Profit splitChallenges 80% – 100%; Instant 50% – 80%60% – 100%
Max drawdownMixedMixed
Consistency ruleYesYes
News tradingAllowedRestricted
Weekend holdingYesLimited
Min trading days3 days1 day
Funding models1-Step, 2-Step, Instant1-Step, 2-Step, Instant
PlatformsMT5, Match-Trader, TradingViewMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader
Rules decoded1112

Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.

The verdict

FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.3/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.

FundingPips runs the tighter rulebook, so City Traders Imperium gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 44 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).

City Traders Imperium allows news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips — FAQ

Is City Traders Imperium or FundingPips better?

FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.3/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. City Traders Imperium is best for swing and position traders who hold through news and weekends and want a balance-based drawdown with no daily cap — and who are disciplined about always setting a stop-loss.; FundingPips is best for discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles..

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips: which has the better profit split?

City Traders Imperium advertises a Challenges 80% – 100%; Instant 50% – 80% profit split; FundingPips advertises 60% – 100%. Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.

Which has stricter rules, City Traders Imperium or FundingPips?

FundingPips runs the tighter rulebook, so City Traders Imperium gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 44 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).

Does City Traders Imperium or FundingPips allow news trading?

City Traders Imperium allows news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.

Picked one? Check for a live discount first.

PropFirmDrops tracks current City Traders Imperium and FundingPips challenge promos & discount codes.

Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with City Traders Imperium or FundingPips. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.