Loading...
Head to head
FundingPips vs Take Profit Trader
FundingPips and Take Profit Tradercompared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.5/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
FundingPips8.8/10 · Forex
Static (non-trailing) evaluation drawdowns, up to 100% split and $2M scaling make it one of the more winnable challenges — as long as you avoid the strategies it deems 'toxic.'
Best for: Discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.
Start a FundingPips challengeTake Profit Trader8.5/10 · Futures
Genuine day-one daily withdrawals and no consistency rule once funded — but the EOD trailing drawdown that becomes INTRADAY on the PRO account is what blows most accounts in week one of funding.
Best for: Active futures scalpers/intraday traders who want fast, frequent payouts and can respect a tight trailing drawdown — not swing traders who need overnight holds.
Start a Take Profit Trader challengeSide by side
| Rule | FundingPips | Take Profit Trader |
|---|---|---|
| FundedWiki rating | 8.8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Type | Forex | Futures |
| Profit split | 60% – 100% | 80% (PRO) / 90% (PRO+) |
| Max drawdown | Mixed | EOD trailing |
| Consistency rule | Yes | Yes |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Limited | — |
| Min trading days | 1 day | 5 days |
| Funding models | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant | 1-Step |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Rithmic |
| Rules decoded | 12 | 10 |
Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.
The verdict
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.5/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
FundingPips and Take Profit Trader land in similar territory on rule strictness — check the per-rule detail on each firm's page for the edge cases that matter to your style.
FundingPips restricts news trading; Take Profit Trader restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
FundingPips vs Take Profit Trader — FAQ
Is FundingPips or Take Profit Trader better?
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.5/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. FundingPips is best for discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.; Take Profit Trader is best for active futures scalpers/intraday traders who want fast, frequent payouts and can respect a tight trailing drawdown — not swing traders who need overnight holds..
FundingPips vs Take Profit Trader: which has the better profit split?
FundingPips advertises a 60% – 100% profit split; Take Profit Trader advertises 80% (PRO) / 90% (PRO+). Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.
Which has stricter rules, FundingPips or Take Profit Trader?
FundingPips and Take Profit Trader land in similar territory on rule strictness — check the per-rule detail on each firm's page for the edge cases that matter to your style.
Does FundingPips or Take Profit Trader allow news trading?
FundingPips restricts news trading; Take Profit Trader restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Picked one? Check for a live discount first.
PropFirmDrops tracks current FundingPips and Take Profit Traderchallenge promos & discount codes.
Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with FundingPips or Take Profit Trader. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.