Loading...
Head to head
FundingPips vs ThinkCapital
FundingPips and ThinkCapitalcompared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.4/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
FundingPips8.8/10 · Forex
Static (non-trailing) evaluation drawdowns, up to 100% split and $2M scaling make it one of the more winnable challenges — as long as you avoid the strategies it deems 'toxic.'
Best for: Discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.
Start a FundingPips challengeThinkCapital8.4/10 · Forex
Broker-backed credibility with no consistency rule on the evaluation programs and forgiving balance-based daily drawdown — just mind the trailing max-DD on Lightning/Bolt and the strict news window.
Best for: Traders who want a broker-backed firm with no consistency rule — Lightning for a fast 1-step, Dual Step Swing if you need overnight/weekend/news flexibility, Bolt for instant funding.
Start a ThinkCapital challengeSide by side
| Rule | FundingPips | ThinkCapital |
|---|---|---|
| FundedWiki rating | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| Type | Forex | Forex |
| Profit split | 60% – 100% | 80% – 90% |
| Max drawdown | Mixed | Mixed |
| Consistency rule | Yes | Yes |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Limited | Limited |
| Min trading days | 1 day | 3 days |
| Funding models | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant | 1-Step, 2-Step, 3-Step, Instant |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader | ThinkTrader, MT4, MT5 |
| Rules decoded | 12 | 10 |
Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.
The verdict
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.4/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
FundingPips runs the tighter rulebook, so ThinkCapital gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 45 vs 44 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
FundingPips restricts news trading; ThinkCapital restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
FundingPips vs ThinkCapital — FAQ
Is FundingPips or ThinkCapital better?
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.4/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. FundingPips is best for discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.; ThinkCapital is best for traders who want a broker-backed firm with no consistency rule — Lightning for a fast 1-step, Dual Step Swing if you need overnight/weekend/news flexibility, Bolt for instant funding..
FundingPips vs ThinkCapital: which has the better profit split?
FundingPips advertises a 60% – 100% profit split; ThinkCapital advertises 80% – 90%. Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.
Which has stricter rules, FundingPips or ThinkCapital?
FundingPips runs the tighter rulebook, so ThinkCapital gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 45 vs 44 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Does FundingPips or ThinkCapital allow news trading?
FundingPips restricts news trading; ThinkCapital restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Picked one? Check for a live discount first.
PropFirmDrops tracks current FundingPips and ThinkCapitalchallenge promos & discount codes.
Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with FundingPips or ThinkCapital. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.