Loading...
Loading...
The evaluation model decides your odds before you place a single trade. Pick the one that matches how you trade.
Prop firms sell three core evaluation models — one-step, two-step, and instant funding. They differ in how fast you reach a funded account, how much they cost, and how hard they are to pass and keep.
Picking the wrong model is the most expensive mistake before you've traded: you pay for an evaluation structured against your style. Here's how each works and who it fits.
One profit target, then you're funded. Quicker and simpler — attractive if you're consistent and want funding fast. The trade-off is usually a tighter drawdown or a consistency rule to stop people gambling to a single target.
Good for disciplined traders who can hit a modest target without a big swing.
Two phases (often a larger target then a smaller one) before funding. It takes longer but the per-phase targets and drawdowns are typically more forgiving, and the evaluation fee is often lower for the same account size.
Good for traders who want room to breathe and don't mind a couple of weeks more to get funded.
You pay and trade a funded (or simulated-funded) account immediately — no target to pass. The catch: the tightest drawdown, the lowest initial split, and often a higher upfront cost, because the firm takes the risk from day one.
Good for proven traders who value time over cost and can trade within a very tight leash from the first trade.
Match the model to your edge: tight, consistent edge → one-step or instant; needs room and variance tolerance → two-step. Then read the drawdown TYPE (static vs trailing) and the consistency rule, which matter more than the model name.
Compute the all-in cost (fee minus any refund-on-first-payout) and the realistic time-to-funded for your win rate before paying.
Two-step is usually more forgiving per phase (smaller targets, looser drawdown) but takes longer; one-step is faster but often pairs with a tighter drawdown or a consistency rule. 'Easier' depends on whether your edge needs room (2-step) or is steady (1-step).
It's worth it for proven, disciplined traders who value getting funded immediately and can trade inside a very tight drawdown — and who accept a lower starting split and higher upfront cost. For most, an evaluation is cheaper per dollar of funding.
Often yes — instant-funding accounts tend to start at a lower split (the firm carries more risk), while evaluation models start higher and scale. Always compare the starting split, not just the advertised maximum.
When a prop firm quietly changes a rule or a verified discount drops, we'll email you. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Double opt-in — we'll email a confirmation link. Educational alerts only, not financial advice.
Educational content only — not financial advice and not affiliated with the firms mentioned. Rules change often; verify against a firm's official terms before relying on any detail.