Loading...
Head to head
Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips
Funded Trading Plus and FundingPipscompared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Funded Trading Plus8.4/10 · Forex
Genuinely flexible — no time limits, no minimum days, EAs and news allowed, and a path to a lifetime 100% split — but watch the Symbol Loss Limit and the same-market-two-accounts profit-nullification rule.
Best for: Discretionary and EA traders who want maximum flexibility (no time/day minimums) and a fast route to a 100% split — and who avoid running the same symbol across accounts.
Start a Funded Trading Plus challengeFundingPips8.8/10 · Forex
Static (non-trailing) evaluation drawdowns, up to 100% split and $2M scaling make it one of the more winnable challenges — as long as you avoid the strategies it deems 'toxic.'
Best for: Discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.
Start a FundingPips challengeSide by side
| Rule | Funded Trading Plus | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| FundedWiki rating | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 |
| Type | Forex | Forex |
| Profit split | 80% → 90% → lifetime 100% | 60% – 100% |
| Max drawdown | Mixed | Mixed |
| Consistency rule | Yes | Yes |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Limited | Limited |
| Min trading days | None | 1 day |
| Funding models | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader |
| Rules decoded | 11 | 12 |
Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.
The verdict
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Funded Trading Plus runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 46 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Funded Trading Plus restricts news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips — FAQ
Is Funded Trading Plus or FundingPips better?
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.4/10 vs 8.8/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. Funded Trading Plus is best for discretionary and EA traders who want maximum flexibility (no time/day minimums) and a fast route to a 100% split — and who avoid running the same symbol across accounts.; FundingPips is best for discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles..
Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips: which has the better profit split?
Funded Trading Plus advertises a 80% → 90% → lifetime 100% profit split; FundingPips advertises 60% – 100%. Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.
Which has stricter rules, Funded Trading Plus or FundingPips?
Funded Trading Plus runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 46 vs 45 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Does Funded Trading Plus or FundingPips allow news trading?
Funded Trading Plus restricts news trading; FundingPips restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Picked one? Check for a live discount first.
PropFirmDrops tracks current Funded Trading Plus and FundingPipschallenge promos & discount codes.
Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with Funded Trading Plus or FundingPips. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.