Head to head
FundingPips vs My Funded Futures
FundingPips and My Funded Futures compared on the things that actually decide a challenge — profit split, drawdown type, the consistency rule, news and weekend trading — straight from each firm's decoded rulebook. FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.4/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
Static (non-trailing) evaluation drawdowns, up to 100% split and $2M scaling make it one of the more winnable challenges — as long as you avoid the strategies it deems 'toxic.'
Best for: Discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.
Start a FundingPips challengeAmong the fastest payouts in futures prop (Rapid: 90/10 daily) with a forgiving EOD trail on most plans — the catch is the trailing drawdown and the eval-only 50% consistency rule, not the $3k goal.
Best for: Active intraday futures scalpers who want quick, frequent withdrawals and can respect a trailing drawdown and the Tier-1 news blackout — Rapid for speed, Core/Flex for the cheapest forgiving start, Pro for larger size.
Start a My Funded Futures challengeSide by side
| Rule | FundingPips | My Funded Futures |
|---|---|---|
| FundedWiki rating | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| Type | Forex | Futures |
| Profit split | 60% – 100% | 80% – 90% |
| Max drawdown | Mixed | Mixed |
| Consistency rule | Yes | Yes |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Limited | — |
| Min trading days | 1 day | 1 day |
| Funding models | 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant | 1-Step, Instant |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, TradingView |
| Rules decoded | 12 | 10 |
Green = the trader-friendlier side on that row (higher rating/more rules decoded, no consistency rule, or freer news/weekend trading). Splits and facts are summarized from each decoded rulebook — open a firm for full per-rule detail and sources.
The verdict
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.4/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade.
My Funded Futures runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 45 vs 48 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
FundingPips restricts news trading; My Funded Futures restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
FundingPips vs My Funded Futures — FAQ
Is FundingPips or My Funded Futures better?
FundingPips edges ahead on FundedWiki's overall rating (8.8/10 vs 8.4/10), but the right pick depends on how you trade. FundingPips is best for discretionary swing/intraday traders who want a static (non-trailing) eval and a high or instant split — and who avoid scalping/arbitrage/news-spike styles.; My Funded Futures is best for active intraday futures scalpers who want quick, frequent withdrawals and can respect a trailing drawdown and the Tier-1 news blackout — Rapid for speed, Core/Flex for the cheapest forgiving start, Pro for larger size..
FundingPips vs My Funded Futures: which has the better profit split?
FundingPips advertises a 60% – 100% profit split; My Funded Futures advertises 80% – 90%. Always confirm the current split on the firm's site before you buy — splits change with promos and scaling.
Which has stricter rules, FundingPips or My Funded Futures?
My Funded Futures runs the tighter rulebook, so FundingPips gives most traders more room to breathe (rule-strictness 45 vs 48 on FundedWiki's 0–100 scale).
Does FundingPips or My Funded Futures allow news trading?
FundingPips restricts news trading; My Funded Futures restricts news trading. If you trade the calendar, that difference alone can decide it.
Picked one? Check for a live discount first.
PropFirmDrops tracks current FundingPips and My Funded Futures challenge promos & discount codes.
Informational and comparison content only — not financial advice, and not affiliated with FundingPips or My Funded Futures. Rules change often; verify against each firm's official terms before relying on any detail.